Okay, maybe it's just me, and maybe I'm just stupid. Everyone else seems to get
it. They sip their lattés up in their ivory towers and laugh. They laugh at both me - in my stupidity - and the ad, which
they get and
I don't.
I pointed out to my girlfriend the other day that all the girls in this ad are tall, while all the guys are short. She, being a girl and therefore inherently jealous (and having height issues), thought that I'd noticed this because I found the girls attractive (and therefore, obviously, more attractive than her). But I noticed this fact because I've been analysing this fucking ad since they started screening it, because I still don't bloody
get it.
So: you start with a (tall) girl walking down the street. She checks out a (short) guy walking past, wearing (what I guess are supposed to be) work clothes and talking on his Nokia 3230 mobile phone. Suddenly, the guy is wearing civvies and walking backwards. Then we get a flash up of the phone: displaying first the guy in work clothes; then it flips to show him in civvies;
then (and this is where I start to get confused) it flips back to show him in work clothes again!
Are they trying to say that, should you have the hide to wear casual clothes, you're actually being counter-productive? That you'll start walking backwards, become short, and tall girls will stop looking at you? I don't think I'm overinterpreting things when I say that the final, repeated flip of him in work gear shows that the moral of the ad is that casualness is the New Hitler, and conformity the New Black.
The second part has a (short) guy going up an escalator. Four (obviously meant to be Japanese) girls are going past him on the down-side. Their inexplicable scowls are turned into "Kawaii!" screams and "V" signs (thus the Japanese thing), as their clothes brighten-up and they smile at him. Again, however, the parting image is of their dismissive scowls (perhaps because he's so short).
The last one is a (tall) girl in a suit stepping out of an elevator. She's then switched to be wearing a trendy red outfit and - once again - walking backwards. Once again, the final flip is of her back in her suit. The freakiest thing about this part is that, if you look closely as she steps out of the elevator, you can see her backwards-walking
alter ego as a phantasm, standing behind her. Maybe the message of this one is: mess with Nokia's conformist ethos, and get fucked with by the Dead. And we all know you should fear the Dead. They have strange powers.
My final estimation of the ad is that it is promoting some kind of Orwellian police state, in which working types - "wage slaves", if you will - are considered the only 'choice' available to people. This status quo is policed by a series of phantasmagoric
daemonae who, á la Philip Pullman's
His Dark Materials, follow people around their whole life, revealing themselves only at the moment of death.
This, to me, is the only sensible interpretation of the ad. T-Gor's suggestion was that the image flip forward-back schtick is a hidden message about the crappy battery life of the thing. Yeah, well, I don't think T-Gor is taking this seriously.